tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18428163.post115348557882015705..comments2011-11-27T23:19:21.447+01:00Christian Plesner Hansenhttps://profiles.google.com/111760511997911681005noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18428163.post-1161370410006751002006-10-20T20:53:00.000+02:002006-10-20T20:53:00.000+02:00I knew there was a catch to all this open source-ing: people can read your code!<BR/><BR/>The super-factory bytecode isn't related to super/inner. It is part of the implementation of a half-baked idea I had for an alternative approach to constructors. <A HREF="http://saturn-language.cvs.sourceforge.net/saturn-language/saturn.stdlib/util/GeneratedList.s?revision=1.1&view=markup" REL="nofollow">This class</A>, for instance, defines a factory method which might give you some idea of how the mechanism works.<BR/><BR/>For one factory method to call a factory method in a superclass corresponds in some sense to calling <B>super</B> in a traditional constructor and that requires a special bytecode.plesnerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/02224596590597033051noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-18428163.post-1161369191432303112006-10-20T20:33:00.000+02:002006-10-20T20:33:00.000+02:00Great paper, I can understand why you want to implement it.<BR/><BR/>Is this related to your INVOKE_SUPER_FACTORY bytecode? What's the function of that?Erik Corryhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11216808773917039691noreply@blogger.com